BBC's (S)Hit Piece

Intro

The military industrial complex owned media are working over time to spread lies, dis-info, and subject the masses to compliant thinking propaganda. Goebbels would have been proud of BBC tactics. So, what are you going to do?

For one, know your enemy and know their MO (Modus Operandi). It does not take a genius to figure it out, as the (very effective tactics) are the same used over and over again. It works well in conditioning us to accept wrong-doing, lies, deception and fraud. Things that were unthinkable decades ago, are readily accepted today. Torture is good. Giving up your freedom means securing liberty. The government is good. Terrorists are everywhere.

The dirt bags at the BBC are shameless charlatans, who play the public as if we were three year olds. Well, BBC, it does not wash any longer. People are waking up.

BBC’s Bacons
A case study on Deception.

What is the Modus Operandi (MO) of government dis-information?

1. Deny knowledge of established or provable facts.
2. Make unsubstantiated statements appear to be factual, often state the exact opposite.
3. Bring in “experts” who back-up by opinion these incorrect statements.
4. Couple lies with truths or half-truths to making it sound reasonable.
5. Establish a false logic (‘non-sequitur’ “it does not follow”), which is then accepted as established, creating a parallel or false reality.
6. Create dictatorial rules, regulations and unnatural laws around that false reality with the sole purpose of controlling and financially raping the population.

Alex Jones, a popular Texan radio host with his nationally syndicated radio show and millions of listeners, was invited to a BBC Radio 5 program, where five professional 9-11 debunkers geared up to assassinate the notion that Western governments were involved in the mass murder of 9/11.

Mr. Jones immediately offered a number of substantiated facts, his accurate logic following along this line:

Governments stage terror attacks and do so against their own people. History has proven exactly that.

• Hitler set fire to the Reichstag (27th February 1933) blaming it on Marinus v. Luebbe. This event led to introduction of dictatorship (Hitler was elected, so was Bush, Gordon Brown was not!).
• Hitler attacked his own Radio Station in Gleiwitz (31 August 1939), which led to the invasion of Poland, and thus WWII.

The US has been caught on several occasions to stage terror attacks. Here Mr. Jones cites two incidents:

• The Gulf of Tonkin incident August 1964, which led to the Vietnam War, was a lie. The government alleged a provocation by Vietnam boats on US destroyers (NSA declassified).
• The attack of the USS Liberty by Israeli Air Force (8th June 1967)

Mr. Jones then reasons that it is therefore not inconceivable to think that the US government was involved in the mass murder on 9/11 (and 7/7 I might add). However, Mr. Jones barely got his points across. His total airtime tallied less than that of a caller who bored listeners with an irrelevant Joan v. Arc theory. Alex Jones was interrupted, faded out, dismissed, and made fun of in a manner that bore strong resemblance to staged political trials. The BBC’s operations are rigged and their dishonesties are obvious to the observer who cares to pay attention.

Continuing on: Richard Bacon establishes his non sequitur and continues to build up propaganda around his false reality: “Surely, governments are not capable of carrying out such evil; therefore 9/11 could not have happened with the involvement of the government.” He and his debunkers go full circle by adding “scientific” disinformation pertaining to the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers 1, 2 and 7, calling Mr. Jones a liar.

While Mr. Bacon continues to cast doubts on official and declassified stories, he plays to Human goodness by stating: “Do you really believe this (nonsense)? Surely, the government would never do such evil!” Of course, Mr. Bacon would have us believe the government loves us. Our government would never harm us... Sure they wouldn’t!

True, it is hard to believe what criminal elements in our governments have conspired to do to us. It is hard to digest the density of evil that is acting against the people, against you and your families, against your neighbors, and against your daughters and sons and grandchildren. Reasonable Human Beings, people with a conscience, will have difficulty accepting its existence. Doing so is life changing and painful.

However, the BBC’s Bacon knows that he is covering up for the BBC/the government: He states on-air that the BBC reported that WTC 7 had fallen before actually it happened. Bacon even admits that previously “lost” tapes of that BBC broadcast had been found, proving the fraud.

He, however, does not care and refuses to follow logic. Richard Bacon of the BBC is a liar. He is complacent to those who do not have the best interest of the people at heart. That, Mr. Bacon, makes you a criminal!

Go on then, believe The BBC’s bacons and what comes out of their orifices... Sure, your government loves you!

The BBC knows that people are not reading; they are not informing themselves; they are not making the effort to question the official stories; and hola, the stage is set for more non-sequiturs. On they ramble, building their shaky disinfo-house with flammable lie-sticks. It will take a few sparks more, emanating from the words of inforwarriors all over the planet to burn the house of misinformation to ashes. It is for the people then to start over, to rise like Phoenix, building on the solid fundament of honesty and accountability.

Mr. Bacon: You and the Big Brother Corporation have become irrelevant. You are deliberately harming the Britain. You are abiding a treasonous enemy. You are the enemy, the enemy of the fine British People, the enemy of Humanity and free society!

Challenge for Mr. Bacon

Well Richard Bacon, do you not like the tone of this? Would you like to earn some respect from your listeners? Why not debunk on the Alex Jones Show? I challenge you to go on the AJ show for an hour and debate Mr. Jones. I am not talking for Mr. Jones, but I am certain that he will not line up five 9/11 Truthers or “conspiracy theorists against you to “debunk” you. He would not have to. Truth does not need unfair game.



Links:
BBC Conspiracy Show (Audio)
Original Story on Infowars.net

In 2008, a 100 Percent Chance of Alarm

By JOHN TIERNEY

Published: January 1, 2008, NY Times

Correction Appended

I’d like to wish you a happy New Year, but I’m afraid I have a different sort of prediction.

You’re in for very bad weather. In 2008, your television will bring you image after frightening image of natural havoc linked to global warming. You will be told that such bizarre weather must be a sign of dangerous climate change — and that these images are a mere preview of what’s in store unless we act quickly to cool the planet.

Unfortunately, I can’t be more specific. I don’t know if disaster will come by flood or drought, hurricane or blizzard, fire or ice. Nor do I have any idea how much the planet will warm this year or what that means for your local forecast. Long-term climate models cannot explain short-term weather.

But there’s bound to be some weird weather somewhere, and we will react like the sailors in the Book of Jonah. When a storm hit their ship, they didn’t ascribe it to a seasonal weather pattern. They quickly identified the cause (Jonah’s sinfulness) and agreed to an appropriate policy response (throw Jonah overboard).

Today’s interpreters of the weather are what social scientists call availability entrepreneurs: the activists, journalists and publicity-savvy scientists who selectively monitor the globe looking for newsworthy evidence of a new form of sinfulness, burning fossil fuels.

A year ago, British meteorologists made headlines predicting that the buildup of greenhouse gases would help make 2007 the hottest year on record. At year’s end, even though the British scientists reported the global temperature average was not a new record — it was actually lower than any year since 2001 — the BBC confidently proclaimed, “2007 Data Confirms Warming Trend.”

When the Arctic sea ice last year hit the lowest level ever recorded by satellites, it was big news and heralded as a sign that the whole planet was warming. When the Antarctic sea ice last year reached the highest level ever recorded by satellites, it was pretty much ignored. A large part of Antarctica has been cooling recently, but most coverage of that continent has focused on one small part that has warmed.

When Hurricane Katrina flooded New Orleans in 2005, it was supposed to be a harbinger of the stormier world predicted by some climate modelers. When the next two hurricane seasons were fairly calm — by some measures, last season in the Northern Hemisphere was the calmest in three decades — the availability entrepreneurs changed the subject. Droughts in California and Australia became the new harbingers of climate change (never mind that a warmer planet is projected to have more, not less, precipitation over all).

The most charitable excuse for this bias in weather divination is that the entrepreneurs are trying to offset another bias. The planet has indeed gotten warmer, and it is projected to keep warming because of greenhouse emissions, but this process is too slow to make much impact on the public.

When judging risks, we often go wrong by using what’s called the availability heuristic: we gauge a danger according to how many examples of it are readily available in our minds. Thus we overestimate the odds of dying in a terrorist attack or a plane crash because we’ve seen such dramatic deaths so often on television; we underestimate the risks of dying from a stroke because we don’t have so many vivid images readily available.

Slow warming doesn’t make for memorable images on television or in people’s minds, so activists, journalists and scientists have looked to hurricanes, wild fires and starving polar bears instead. They have used these images to start an “availability cascade,” a term coined by Timur Kuran, professor of economics and political science at Duke University, and Cass R. Sunstein, a law professor at the University of Chicago.

The availability cascade is a self-perpetuating process: the more attention a danger gets, the more worried people become, leading to more news coverage and more fear. Once the images of Sept. 11 made terrorism seem a major threat, the press and the police lavished attention on potential new attacks and supposed plots. After Three Mile Island and “The China Syndrome,” minor malfunctions at nuclear power plants suddenly became newsworthy.

“Many people concerned about climate change,” Dr. Sunstein says, “want to create an availability cascade by fixing an incident in people’s minds. Hurricane Katrina is just an early example; there will be others. I don’t doubt that climate change is real and that it presents a serious threat, but there’s a danger that any ‘consensus’ on particular events or specific findings is, in part, a cascade.”

Once a cascade is under way, it becomes tough to sort out risks because experts become reluctant to dispute the popular wisdom, and are ignored if they do. Now that the melting Arctic has become the symbol of global warming, there’s not much interest in hearing other explanations of why the ice is melting — or why the globe’s other pole isn’t melting, too.

Global warming has an impact on both polar regions, but they’re also strongly influenced by regional weather patterns and ocean currents. Two studies by NASA and university scientists last year concluded that much of the recent melting of Arctic sea ice was related to a cyclical change in ocean currents and winds, but those studies got relatively little attention — and were certainly no match for the images of struggling polar bears so popular with availability entrepreneurs.

Roger A. Pielke Jr., a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado, recently noted the very different reception received last year by two conflicting papers on the link between hurricanes and global warming. He counted 79 news articles about a paper in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, and only 3 news articles about one in a far more prestigious journal, Nature.

Guess which paper jibed with the theory — and image of Katrina — presented by Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth”?

It was, of course, the paper in the more obscure journal, which suggested that global warming is creating more hurricanes. The paper in Nature concluded that global warming has a minimal effect on hurricanes. It was published in December — by coincidence, the same week that Mr. Gore received his Nobel Peace Prize.

In his acceptance speech, Mr. Gore didn’t dwell on the complexities of the hurricane debate. Nor, in his roundup of the 2007 weather, did he mention how calm the hurricane season had been. Instead, he alluded somewhat mysteriously to “stronger storms in the Atlantic and Pacific,” and focused on other kinds of disasters, like “massive droughts” and “massive flooding.”

“In the last few months,” Mr. Gore said, “it has been harder and harder to misinterpret the signs that our world is spinning out of kilter.” But he was being too modest. Thanks to availability entrepreneurs like him, misinterpreting the weather is getting easier and easier.

Correction: January 4, 2008

The Findings column in Science Times on Tuesday, about the way severe weather is tied to predictions of global warming, gave an outdated academic affiliation for Timur Kuran. He is a professor of economics and political science at Duke University; he is no longer a professor of economics and law at the University of Southern California.

Ruled by Puppets of the Criminal "Elite"

Image from private-eye.co.uk



From Hitler to Brown

Where Hitler left off in 1945, Anthony Blair, Angela Merkel, Gordon Brown and their comrades continue today. Adolf Hitler would turn in his grave in perverse excitement about the skillful implementation of fascist, zero-tolerance, police states under the umbrella of a totalitarian Europe. George Orwell's peek in the future "1984" depicts a reality that is a walk in the park compared to what the globalists have in stock for you and your children. For those of you who think that the government is good and has your best interest in mind, I would like to say this:

It is not only your right, but it is also your duty to:

• Educate yourselves, your friends, family, colleagues and your neighbors
• Learn
• Read
• Compare
• Analyze
• Conclude
• Act

The problem is that most of us, including myself, have been conditioned by the corporate controlled media to accept whatever government script is read on air, or printed on paper. If it is on TV, the BBC, CBS, or Fox, it must be true... Of course, mainstream reporters do not tell you that they get their marching orders from the White House or 10 Downing Street. The local news anchors, those who we tend to trust, regurgitate whatever the puppet masters prescribe in their daily marching orders. It is called Yellow journalism.

BBC English, modern: Big Brother Corporation, propaganda tool of the globalist elite, deceitful

What is at stake?

A strong statement, indeed. For those of you who have not woken up to reality, these news are disturbing. For many it all seems far-fetched and unbelievable. How do we know if we do not verify the claims made and allow ourselves to consider all information. Do you think that your freedom, your health, your well-being and your life are worth this effort?

power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely (cliché)

Are you one of those men who go and vent all your natural warrior energy by watching and cheering football games? Have football, or television soaps become an important part of your life? If it has, it has been done TO you by design. By focusing you on sports, soaps, the X-Factor or Strictly Come Dancing, you are neutralised, your natural survival instincts are turned off the moment you turn your TV on. It has been designed by the industrial-military complex to deliberately divert your natural warrior instincts for liberty and self determination into something that does not interfere with the globalist-elite's plans to enslave you and your family.

Criminal Elements

Many politicians are good. Most are corrupt. The majority of these are humanoids: selfish and corrupt. We, the people, have successfuly been conditioned to accept this as a way of life, something that just IS. It is working. You ARE accepting it as something that cannot be changed. That's just the way it IS... Right? While this is bad in itself, I am not talking about the general politician scum that parasitically lives off your hard earned money, stealing your rightful property under the legal cover of self serving laws.

I am talking about the puppets in highest places of government -- the criminal elements who sell their soul for a couple of coins. I am talking about the Muppet's who are knowingly deceive you, the people. I am talking about the criminal elements who attend the Bilderberg meetings or send representatives on their behalf to receive marching orders from unelected elites. I am talking about those minions who wage war and kill in your name. I am pointing to those who erode our liberties.

We are officially living in tyranny!

(to be continued)